Paper detail

Subcritical insability of viscoelastic flow over a circular cylinder: A numerical study

In this paper, we discuss whether the instability of viscoelastic flow around a circular cylinder is subcritical or supercritical by numerical simulation. The Oldroyd-B model is selected to describe the viscoelastic constitutive relationship. The Log-conformation reformulation is employed to stabilize numerical simulation. The parameter ranges investigated are the Reynolds numbers ($Re$) spanning from 5 to 100 and the Weissenberg number ($Wi$) spanning from 0 to 10, with a fixed viscosity ratio of $β= 0.9$. Simulations are performed under two paths, i.e., 1) increasing $Re$ (or $Wi$) and 2) decreasing $Re$ (or $Wi$) slowly and gradually from one state to the next. The results show that the statistical solutions such as the time-averaged velocity obtained along the two paths are not identical over certain parameter range, which is around the transition point from the steady to unsteady flow. This loading path dependence behaviour indicates that the flow instability is subcritical.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.