Paper detail

Subaru and Gemini Observations of SS 433: New Constraint on the Mass of the Compact Object

We present results of optical spectroscopic observations of the mass donor star in SS 433 with Subaru and Gemini, with an aim to best constrain the mass of the compact object. Subaru/FOCAS observations were performed on October 6-8 and 10, 2007, covering the orbital phase of phi=0.96-0.26. We first calculate cross correlation function of these spectra with that of the reference star HD 9233 in the wavelength range of 4740-4840 Angstrom. This region is selected to avoid 'strong' absorption lines accompanied with contaminating emission components. The same analysis is applied to archive data of Gemini/GMOS taken at phi=0.84-0.30 by Hillwig & Gies (2008). From the Subaru and Gemini CCF results, the amplitude of radial velocity curve of the donor star is determined to be 58.3+/-3.8 km s-1 with a systemic velocity of 59.2+/-2.5 km s-1. Together with the radial velocity curve of the compact object, we derive the mass of the donor star and compact object to be M_O=12.4+/-1.9 M_sun and M_X=4.3+/-0.6 M_sun, respectively. We conclude, however, that these values should be taken as upper limits. From the analysis of the averaged absorption line profiles of strong lines and weak lines observed with Subaru, we find evidence for heating effects from the compact object. Using a simple model, we find that the true radial velocity amplitude of the donor star could be as low as 40+/-5 km s-1 in order to produce the observed absorption-line profiles. Taking into account the heating of the donor star may lower the derived masses to M_O=10.4 +2.3/-1.9 M_sun and M_X=2.5 +0.7/-0.6 M_sun. Our final constraint, 1.9 M_sun< M_X <4.9 M_sun, indicates that the compact object in SS 433 is most likely a low mass black hole, although the possibility of a massive neutron star cannot be firmly excluded.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.