Paper detail

Sub-millimetre source identifications and the micro-Jansky source population at 8.4 GHz in the William Herschel Deep Field

[Abridged] Sub-mm observations of the William Herschel Deep Field using LABOCA revealed possible counterparts for 2 X-ray absorbed QSOs. The aim here is to exploit EVLA imaging at 8.4 GHz to establish the QSOs as radio/sub-mm sources. The challenge in reducing the EVLA data was the presence of a strong 4C source in the field. A new calibration algorithm was applied to the data to subtract it. The resulting thermal noise limited radio map covers the 16&#39;x16&#39; Extended WHDF. It contains 41 sources above a 4-sigma limit, 17 of which have primary beam corrected flux. The radio observations show that the absorbed AGN with LABOCA detections are coincident with radio sources, confirming the tendency for X-ray absorbed AGN to be sub-mm bright. These sources show strong ultraviolet excess (UVX) suggesting the nuclear sightline is gas- but not dust-absorbed. Of the 3 remaining LABOCA sources within the ~5&#39; half-power beam width, 1 is identified with a faint nuclear X-ray/radio source in a nearby galaxy, 1 with a faint radio source and 1 is unidentified in any other band. More generally, differential radio source counts are in good agreement with previous observations, showing at S<50 micro-Jy a significant excess over a pure AGN model. In the full area, of 10 sources fainter than this limit, 6 have optical counterparts of which 3 are UVX (i.e. likely QSOs) including the 2 absorbed quasar LABOCA sources. The other faint radio counterparts are not UVX but are only slightly less blue and likely to be star-forming/merging galaxies, predominantly at lower luminosities and redshifts. The 4 faint, optically unidentified radio sources may be either dust obscured QSOs or galaxies. These high-z obscured AGN and lower-z star-forming populations are thus the main candidates to explain the observed excess in faint source counts and hence the excess radio background found previously by the ARCADE2 experiment.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.