Paper detail

Sub-Linear Root Detection, and New Hardness Results, for Sparse Polynomials Over Finite Fields

We present a deterministic 2^O(t)q^{(t-2)(t-1)+o(1)} algorithm to decide whether a univariate polynomial f, with exactly t monomial terms and degree <q, has a root in F_q. A corollary of our method --- the first with complexity sub-linear in q when t is fixed --- is that the nonzero roots in F_q can be partitioned into at most 2 \sqrt{t-1} (q-1)^{(t-2)(t-1)} cosets of two subgroups S_1,S_2 of F^*_q, with S_1 in S_2. Another corollary is the first deterministic sub-linear algorithm for detecting common degree one factors of k-tuples of t-nomials in F_q[x] when k and t are fixed. When t is not fixed we show that each of the following problems is NP-hard with respect to BPP-reductions, even when p is prime: (1) detecting roots in F_p for f, (2) deciding whether the square of a degree one polynomial in F_p[x] divides f, (3) deciding whether the discriminant of f vanishes, (4) deciding whether the gcd of two t-nomials in F_p[x] has positive degree. Finally, we prove that if the complexity of root detection is sub-linear (in a refined sense), relative to the straight-line program encoding, then NEXP is not in P/Poly.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.