Paper detail

Sub-Chandrasekhar progenitors favoured for type Ia supernovae: Evidence from late-time spectroscopy

A non-local-thermodynamic-equilibrium (NLTE) level population model of the first and second ionisation stages of iron, nickel and cobalt is used to fit a sample of XShooter optical + near-infrared (NIR) spectra of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia). From the ratio of the NIR lines to the optical lines limits can be placed on the temperature and density of the emission region. We find a similar evolution of these parameters across our sample. Using the evolution of the Fe II 12$\,$570$\,\mathring{A}\,$to 7$\,$155$\,\mathring{A}\,$line as a prior in fits of spectra covering only the optical wavelengths we show that the 7200$\,\mathring{A}\,$feature is fully explained by [Fe II] and [Ni II] alone. This approach allows us to determine the abundance of Ni II$\,$/$\,$Fe II for a large sample of 130 optical spectra of 58 SNe Ia with uncertainties small enough to distinguish between Chandrasekhar mass (M$_{\text{Ch}}$) and sub-Chandrasekhar mass (sub-M$_{\text{Ch}}$) explosion models. We conclude that the majority (85$\%$) of normal SNe Ia have a Ni/Fe abundance that is in agreement with predictions of sub-M$_{\text{Ch}}$ explosion simulations of $\sim Z_\odot$ progenitors. Only a small fraction (11$\%$) of objects in the sample have a Ni/Fe abundance in agreement with M$_{\text{Ch}}$ explosion models.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.