SU(2) representations and a large surgery formula

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Abstract

A knot K⊂S3K\subset S^3 is called SU(2)SU(2)-abundant if it satisfies two conditions: first, for all but finitely many r∈Q\{0}r\in\mathbb{Q}\backslash\{0\}, there exists an irreducible representation π1(Sr3(K))→SU(2)π_1(S^3_r(K))\to SU(2); second, any slope r=u/v≠0r=u/v\neq 0 for which Sr3(K)S^3_r(K) admits no irreducible SU(2)SU(2) representation must satisfy ΔK(ζ2)=0Δ_K(ζ^2)= 0 for some uu-th root of unity ζζ. We show that if a nontrivial knot K⊂S3K\subset S^3 is not SU(2)SU(2)-abundant then it is a prime knot whose Alexander polynomial ΔK(t)Δ_K(t) has coefficients restricted to {−1,0,1}\{-1,0,1\}. This implies, in particular, that all hyperbolic alternating knots are SU(2)SU(2)-abundant. Our proof hinges on a large surgery formula connecting instanton knot homology KHI(S3,K)KHI(S^3,K) and framed instanton homology I♯(Sn3(K))I^\sharp(S^3_n(K)) for integers nn satisfying ∣n∣≥2g(K)+1|n|\ge 2g(K)+1. Using this technique, we derive several interesting results in instanton Floer homology: for any Berge knot KK, the spaces KHI(S3,K)KHI(S^3,K) and HFK^(S3,K)\widehat{HFK}(S^3,K) have identical dimension; for any dual knot Kr⊂Sr3(K)K_r\subset S^3_r(K) of a Berge knot KK with r>2g(K)−1r> 2g(K)-1, we prove dim⁡CKHI(Sr3(K),Kr)=∣H1(Sr3(K);Z)∣\dim_\mathbb{C}KHI(S^3_r(K),K_r)=|H_1(S^3_r(K);\mathbb{Z})|; and for any genus-one alternating knot KK and any r∈Q\{0}r\in\mathbb{Q}\backslash\{0\}, the spaces I♯(Sr3(K))I^\sharp(S^3_r(K)) and HF^(Sr3(K))\widehat{HF}(S_r^3(K)) have equal dimension.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.