Paper detail

Stumbling over planetary building blocks: AU Microscopii as an example of the challenge of retrieving debris-disk dust properties

We explore whether assumptions about dust grain shape affect resulting estimates of the composition and grain size distribution of the AU Microscopii (AU Mic) debris disk from scattered light data collected by Lomax et al. (2018). The near edge-on orientation of the AU Mic debris disk makes it ideal for studying the effect of the scattering phase function (SPF) on the measured flux ratios as a function of wavelength and projected distance. Previous efforts to model the AU Mic debris disk have invoked a variety of dust grain compositions and explored the effect of porosity, but did not undertake a systematic effort to explore a full range of size distributions and compositions to understand possible degeneracies in fitting the data. The degree to which modelling dust grains with more realistic shapes compounds these degeneracies has also not previously been explored. We find differences in the grain properties retrieved depending on the grain shape model used. We also present here our calculations of porous grains of size parameters x = 0.1 to 48 and complex refractive indices (m = n+ik) ranging from n = 1.1 to 2.43 and k = 0 to 1.0, covering multiple compositions at visible and near infrared wavelengths such as ice, silicates, amorphous carbon, and tholins.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.