Paper detail

Studying the spatially resolved Schmidt-Kennicutt law in interacting galaxies: the case of Arp 158

Recent studies have shown that star formation in mergers does not seem to follow the same Schmidt-Kennicutt (KS) relation as in spiral disks, presenting a higher star formation rate (SFR) for a given gas column density. In this paper we study why and how different models of star formation arise. To do so we examine the process of star formation in the interacting system Arp 158 and its tidal debris. We perform an analysis of the properties of specific regions of interest in Arp 158 using observations tracing the atomic and the molecular gas, star formation, the stellar populations as well as optical spectroscopy to determine their exact nature. We also fit their spectral energy distribution with an evolutionary synthesis code. Finally, we compare star formation in these objects to star formation in the disks of spiral galaxies and mergers. Abundant molecular gas is found throughout the system and the tidal tails appear to have many young stars compared to their old stellar content. One of the nuclei is dominated by a starburst whereas the other is an active nucleus. We estimate the SFR throughout the system and find that most regions follow closely the KS relation seen in spiral galaxies with the exception of the nuclear starburst and the tip of one of the tails. We examine whether this diversity is due to uncertainties in the manner the SFR is determined or whether the conditions in the nuclear starburst region are such that it does not follow the same KS law as other regions. Observations of the interacting system Arp 158 provide the first evidence in a resolved fashion that different star-forming regions in a merger may be following different KS laws. This suggests that the physics of the interstellar medium at a scale no larger than 1 kpc, the size of the largest gravitational instabilities and the injection scale of turbulence, determines the origin of these laws.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.