Paper detail

Studying the kinematic asymmetries of disks and post-coalescence mergers using a new `kinemetry' criterion

We have obtained VIMOS/VLT optical integral field spectroscopy (IFS) data for a sample of 4 LIRGs which have been selected at a similar distance ($\sim$ 70 Mpc) to avoid relative resolution effects. They have been classified in two groups (isolated disk and post-coalescence mergers) according to their morphology. The $kinemetry$ method (developed by Krajnovic and coworkers) is used to characterize the kinematic properties of these galaxies and to discuss new criteria for distinguishing their status. We present and discuss new kinematic maps (i.e., velocity field and velocity dispersion) for these four galaxies. The morphological and kinematic classifications of these systems are consistent, with disks having lower kinematic asymmetries than post-coalescence mergers. We then propose and discuss a new kinematic criterion to differentiate these two groups. This criterion distinguishes better these two categories and has the advantage of being less sensitive to angular resolution effects. According to the previous criteria,the present post-coalescence systems would have been classified as disks. This indicates that the separation of disks from mergers is subjective to the definition of `merger'. It also suggests that previous estimates of the merger/disk ratio could have been underestimated, but larger samples are necessary to establish a firmer conclusion.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.