Paper detail

Structures of the $f_0(980)$, $a_0(980)$ mesons and the strong coupling constants $g_{f_0 K^+ K^-}$, $g_{a_0 K^+ K^-}$ with the light-cone QCD sum rules

In this article, with the assumption of explicit isospin violation arising from the $f_0(980)-a_0(980)$ mixing, we take the point of view that the scalar mesons $f_0(980)$ and $a_0(980)$ have both strange and non-strange quark-antiquark components and evaluate the strong coupling constants $g_{f_0 K^+ K^-}$ and $g_{a_0 K^+ K^-}$ within the framework of the light-cone QCD sum rules approach. The large strong scalar-$KK$ couplings through both the $n\bar{n}$ and $s\bar{s}$ components $g^{\bar{n}n}_{f_0 K^+ K^-}$, $g^{\bar{s}s}_{f_0 K^+ K^-}$, $g^{\bar{n}n}_{a_0 K^+ K^-}$ and $g^{\bar{s}s}_{a_0 K^+ K^-}$will support the hadronic dressing mechanism, furthermore, in spite of the constituent structure differences between the $f_0(980)$ and $a_0(980)$ mesons, the strange components have larger strong coupling constants with the $K^+K^-$ state than the corresponding non-strange ones, $g_{f_0 K^+ K^-}^{\bar{s}s}\approx \sqrt{2}g_{f_0 K^+ K^-}^{\bar{n}n}$ and $g_{a_0 K^+ K^-}^{\bar{s}s}\approx \sqrt{2} g_{a_0 K^+ K^-}^{\bar{n}n}$. From the existing controversial values, we can not reach a general consensus on the strong coupling constants $g_{f_0 K^+ K^-}$, $g_{a_0 K^+ K^-}$ and the mixing angles.

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.