Paper detail

Studying $\mathcal{B}_1(\frac{1}{2}^+)\to \mathcal{B}_2(\frac{1}{2}^+)\ell^+\ell^-$ Semi-leptonic Weak Baryon Decays with the SU(3) Flavor Symmetry

Motivated by recent anomalies in FCNC $b\to s\ell^+\ell^-$, we study $B_1\to B_2\ell^+\ell^-(\ell=e,μ,τ)$ semi-leptonic weak decays with the SU(3) flavor symmetry, where $B_{1,2}$ are the spin-1/2 baryons of single bottomed anti-triplet $T_{b3}$, single charmed anti-triplet $T_{c3}$ or light baryon octet $T_{8}$. Using the SU(3) irreducible representation approach, we first obtain the amplitude relations among different decays, and then predict the relevant not-yet measured observables of these decays. (a) We calculate the branching ratios of the $T_{b3}\to T_8 μ^+μ^-$ and $T_{b3}\to T_8 τ^+τ^-$ in the whole $q^2$ region and in the different $q^2$ bins by the measurement of $Λ^0_b\to Λ^0 μ^+μ^-$. Many of them are obtained for the first time. In addition, the longitudinal polarization fractions and the leptonic forward-backward asymmetries of all $T_{b3}\to T_{8}\ell^+\ell^-$ decays are very similar to each other in certain $q^2$ bin due to the SU(3) flavor symmetry. (b) We analyze the upper limits of $B(T_{c3}\to T_{8}\ell^+\ell^-)$ by using the experimental upper limits of $B(Λ^+_c\to pμ^+μ^-)$ and $B(Λ^+_c\to pe^+e^-)$, and find the experimental upper limit of $B(Λ^+_c\to pμ^+μ^-)$ giving effective bounds on the relevant SU(3) flavor symmetry parameters. The predictions of $B(Ξ^0_c \to Ξ^0e^+e^-)$ and $B(Ξ^0_c \to Ξ^0μ^+μ^-)$ will be different between the single-quark transition dominant contributions and the W-exchange dominant ones. (c) As for $T_{8}\to T'_8 \ell^+\ell^-$ decays, we analyze the single-quark transition contributions and the W-exchange contributions by using two measurements of $ B(Ξ^0\to Λ^0 e^+e^-)$ and $ B(Σ^+\to pμ^+μ^-)$, and give the branching ratio predictions by assuming either single-quark transition dominant contributions or the W-exchange dominant ones.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.