Paper detail

Study of $X_{c}(3250)$ as a $D_{0}^{*}(2400)N$ molecular state

We present a QCD sum rule analysis for the newly observed resonance $X_{c}(3250)$ by assuming it as a $D_{0}^{*}(2400)N$ molecular state. Technically, contributions of operators up to dimension 12 are included in the operator product expansion (OPE). We find that it is difficult to find the conventional OPE convergence in this work. By trying releasing the rigid OPE convergence criterion, one could find that the OPE convergence is still under control in the present work and the numerical result for $D_{0}^{*}(2400)N$ state is $3.18\pm0.51 {GeV}$, which is in agreement with the experimental data of $X_{c}(3250)$. In view of that the conventional OPE convergence is not obtained here, thus only weak conclusions can be drawn regarding the explanation of $X_{c}(3250)$ in terms of a $D_{0}^{*}(2400)N$ molecular state. As a byproduct, the mass for the bottom counterpart $\bar{B}_{0}^{*}N$ state is predicted to be $6.50\pm0.49 {GeV}$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.