Paper detail

Study of typical space wave-particle coupling events possibly related with seismic activity

Based on the DEMETER satellite, we found two space wave-particle coupling events during February 2010 taking place in the range of McIlwain parameter $L$($1.27\sim1.37$). There are strong spatial and temporal correlation between the particle bursts(PBs) and the electromagnetic disturbances of the coupling events. The two PBs show different energy spectrum characteristics, while the corresponding electromagnetic disturbances concentrated on different frequencies range. In agreement with the prediction of the theory of wave-particle interaction, we conclude that the two wave-particle interactions can be probably explained as following: one is electron dominant precipitation with energy of $0.09\sim0.2$ MeV induced by VLF electromagnetic wave with the frequency of $14\sim20$ kHz, and another is proton dominant precipitation with energy of $0.65\sim2.85$ MeV induced by VLF electromagnetic wave with the frequency of $\le 100$ Hz. For the first time, those particle bursts origin, from electron or proton detected by the Instrument for the Detection of Particles(IDP) on board, is inferred by theory calculation, although the Instrument has no ability to identify the particle species.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.