Paper detail

Study of the Power-Law Fluctuations in the Email Size

In a previous study, we investigated the frequency distribution of the email size in the system log data of the main email server for the staff on a campus network. We found that the frequencies of email sizes followed a power-law distribution and discovered two inflection points in the distribution. After analyzing these results, we collected new system log data for both staff and students for the period from April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2015 and analyzed the frequency distributions per academic year. The results of the earlier investigation were replicated for each of these distributions. Then, we disaggregated the system log data for the staff for the period from May 1, 2015 to July 31, 2015 using the email header "Content-Type" and created four subdistributions. Frequency distributions were calculated for the disaggregated data. We then proposed and evaluated a model to explain the overall frequency distribution as a sum of the four subdistributions. The correlation coefficient between the observed frequency distribution and the distribution predicted by our model was 0.8408 for the staff. This coefficient confirmed that our approach can successfully model and predict the size distribution of emails.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.