Paper detail

Study of the four-body decays $B^{0}_{S} \rightarrow ππππ$ in the perturbative QCD approach

In this work, we analyse the CP-averaged branching ratios and direct CP-violating asymmetries of the four-body decays B_{S} \rightarrow ππππdecay from the S-wave resonances, f_{0}(980) and f_{0}(500) and P-wave resonances, ρ(770) by introducing the S-wave and P-wave ππdistribution amplitudes within the framework of the perturbative QCD approach. We also calculate branching ratios of the two-body decays B^{0}_{S}\rightarrowρ^{0}ρ^{0}, B^{0}_{S}\rightarrowρ^{+}ρ^{-} from the corresponding quasi-two-body decays models and compare our results with those obtained in previous perturbative QCD approach, QCD factorization approach and FAT approach, it is found that the predictions are consistent with present data within errors. The branching ratios of our calculations for the four-body decays B_{S}\rightarrow ππππare at the order of the 10^{-7}. For the CP-violating asymmetries, we found that CP-violating asymmetry can be enhanced largely by the ρ-ωmixing resonances when ππpairs masses are in the vicinity of ωresonance.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.