Paper detail

Study of Self-Interaction Errors in Density Functional Calculations of Magnetic Exchange Coupling Constants Using Three Self-Interaction Correction Methods

We examine the role of self-interaction errors (SIE) removal on the evaluation of magnetic exchange coupling constants. In particular we analyze the effect of scaling down the self-interaction-correction (SIC) for three {\em non-empirical} density functional approximations (DFAs) namely, the local spin density approximation, the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof generalized gradient approximation, and recent SCAN family of meta-GGA functionals. To this end, we employ three one-electron SIC methods: Perdew-Zunger [Perdew, J. P.; Zunger, A. \textit{Phys. Rev. B}, {\bf 1981}, \textit{23}, 5048] SIC, the orbitalwise scaled SIC method [Vydrov, O. A. \textit{et al.}, \textit{J. Chem. Phys.} {\bf 2006,} \textit{124}, 094108], and the recent {local} scaling method [Zope, R. R. \textit{et al.}, \textit{J. Chem. Phys.} {\bf 2019}, \textit{151}, 214108]. We compute the magnetic exchange coupling constants using the spin projection and non projection approaches for sets of molecules composed of dinuclear and polynuclear H--He models, organic radical molecules, and chlorocuprate, and compare these results against accurate theories and experiment. Our results show that for the systems that mainly consist of single electron regions, PZSIC performs well but for more complex organic systems and the chlorcuprates, an overcorrecting tendency of PZSIC combined with the DFAs utilized in this work is more pronounced, and in such cases LSIC with kinetic energy density ratio performs better than PZSIC. Analysis of the results in terms of SIC corrections to the density and to the total energy shows that both density and energy correction are required to obtain an improved prediction of magnetic exchange couplings.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.