Paper detail

Study of Nonleptonic $B^{\ast}_{(s)}\to M_1 M_2$ $(M=D$, $D_s$, $π$, $K)$ Weak Decays with Factorization Approach

Motivated by the experiments of heavy flavor physics at running LHC and upgrading SuperKEKB/Belle-II in the future, the nonleptonic $B^{\ast}_{(s)}\to M_1 M_2$ $(M=D$, $D_s$, $π$, $K)$ weak decays are studied in this paper. The amplitudes are calculated with factorization approach, and the transition form factors $A_0^{B^{\ast}_{(s)}\to M_1}(0)$ are evaluated within BSW model. With the reasonable approximation $Γ_{tot}(B^*_{(s)})\simeq Γ(B^*_{(s)}\to B_{(s)}γ)$, our predictions of branching fractions are presented. Numerically, the CKM-favored tree-dominated $\bar{B}^{*0} \to D^+D^-_s$ and $\bar{B}^{*0}_s \to D^+_sD^-_s$ decays have the largest branching fractions of the order $\sim{\cal O}(10^{-8})$, and hence will be firstly observed by forthcoming Belle-II experiment. However, most of the other decay modes have the branching fractions~$<{\cal O}(10^{-9})$ and thus are hardly to be observed soon. Besides, for the possible detectable $B^{\ast}_{(s)}$ decays with branching fractions $\gtrsim{\cal O}(10^{-9})$, some useful ratios, such as $R_D$ {\it et al.,} are presented and discussed in detail.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.