Paper detail

Study of Molecular Clouds associated with HII Regions

The properties of molecular clouds associated with 10 HII regions were studied using CO observations. We identified 142 dense clumps within our sample and found that our sources are divided into two categories: those with clumps that show a power law size-line width relation (Type I) and those which do not show any relation (Type II). The clumps in the Type I sources have larger power law indices than found in previous studies. The clumps in the Type II sources have larger line widths and show evidence (such as outflows) of current active star formation within the clump. We suggest that the lack of a size-line width relation is a sign of current active star formation. Massive clumps seem to have similar masses calculated by different methods but lower mass clumps have larger virial masses compared to velocity integrated and LTE mass. We found no relation between mass distribution of the clumps and distance from the H~II region ionization front, but a weak decrease of the excitation temperature with increasing distance from the ionized gas. The clumps in collected shells around the H~II regions have slightly larger line widths but no relation was found between line width and distance from the H~II region, which probably indicates that the internal dynamics of the clumps are not affected by the ionized gas. Internal sources of turbulence, such as outflows and stellar winds from young proto-stars may have a more important role on the molecular gas dynamics. We suggest that large line width and larger size-line width power law indices are therefore the initial characteristics of clumps in massive star forming clouds and that some may evolve into objects similar to our Type II sources, where local "second generation" stars are forming and eliminating the size-line-width relation.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.