Paper detail

Study of dynamical heterogeneities in aging colloidal nanoclay suspensions

An aqueous suspension of the synthetic clay Laponite undergoes a transition from a liquid-like ergodic state to a glass-like nonergodic arrested state. In an observation that closely resembles the dynamical slowdown observed in supercooled liquids, the phenomenon of kinetic arrest in Laponite suspensions is accompanied by a growth in the $α$-relaxation time with increasing sample aging time, $t_{w}$. The ubiquitous dynamic slowdown and fragile behavior observed in glass forming liquids approaching the glass transition is typically ascribed to the growth in the size of distinct dynamical heterogeneities. In this article, we present the characterization of the dynamical heterogeneities in aging colloidal Laponite clay systems by invoking the three-point dynamic susceptibility formalism. The average time-dependent two-point intensity autocorrelation and its sensitivity to the control parameter $t_{w}$ are probed in dynamic light scattering experiments. Distributions of relaxation time scales deduced from Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts equation widen with increasing $t_{w}$ signifying the heterogeneous dynamic slowdown. A suitable formalism to calculate three-point correlation function is employed for aging colloidal suspension where the main control parameter is $t_{w}$. The calculated three-point dynamic susceptibility exhibits a peak, with the peak height increasing with evolving $t_{w}$. The number of dynamically correlated particles is seen to initially increase with increasing $t_{w}$ at a fast rate, before eventually slowing down close to the non-ergodic transition point.This observation is in agreement with reports on supercooled liquids. Our study confirms the growth of dynamical heterogeneities in suspensions of Laponite, thereby shedding new light on the fragile supercooled liquid-like dynamics of aging suspensions of these anisotropic, charged, colloidal clay nanoparticles.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.