Paper detail

Study of deteriorating semiopaque turquoise lead-potassium glass beads at different stages of corrosion using micro-FTIR spectroscopy

Nowadays, a problem of historical beadworks conservation in museum collections is actual more than ever because of fatal corrosion of the 19th century glass beads. Vibrational spectroscopy is a powerful method for investigation of glass, namely, of correlation of the structure-chemical composition. Therefore, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy was used for examination of degradation processes in cloudy turquoise glass beads, which in contrast to other color ones deteriorate especially strongly. Micro-X-ray fluorescence spectrometry of samples has shown that lead-potassium glass PbO-K$_2$O-SiO$_2$ with small amount of Cu and Sb was used for manufacture of cloudy turquoise beads. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy study of the beads at different stages of glass corrosion was carried out in the range from 200 to 4000 cm$^{-1}$ in the attenuated total reflection mode. In all the spectra, we have observed shifts of two major absorption bands to low-frequency range (~1000 and ~775 cm$^{-1}$) compared to ones typical for amorphous SiO2 (~1100 and 800 cm$^{-1}$, respectively). Such an effect is connected with Pb$^{2+}$ and K$^+$ appending to the glass network. The presence of a weak band at ~1630 cm$^{-1}$ in all the spectra is attributed to the adsorption of H$_2$O. After annealing of the beads, the band disappeared completely in less deteriorated samples and became significantly weaker in more destroyed ones. Based on that we conclude that there is adsorbed molecular water on the beads. However, products of corrosion (e.g., alkali in the form of white crystals or droplets of liquid alkali) were not observed on the glass surface. We have also observed glass depolymerisation in the strongly degraded beads, which is exhibited in domination of the band peaked at ~1000 cm$^{-1}$.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.