Paper detail

Study of a 43 day optical quasi-periodic oscillation for BL Lac S5 0716+714

The data for BL Lac object S5 0716+714 optical B, R and I bands are collected from November 10, 2017 to May 15, 2018. The raw data consists of 21396 quasi-simultaneous multi-band points, with 7132 data points for each band. To search for the quasi-periodic oscillation (QPO) signal of S5 0716+714, the Lomb Scargle periodogram (LSP) method and the Weighted Wavelet Z-transform (WWZ) method are used, and the light curve simulation method is utilized to estimate the significance level of the QPO. For the first time, a QPO with 43-day (> 95% confidence level) of approximate moon-like oscillations is revealed using these techniques. Furthermore, further research indicates that optical radiation is produced as a result of relativistic jet. This 43-day QPO can be explained by a spiral motion of a blob with velocity $\vec β$ along the jet. In addition, this 43-day QPO is superimposed on a longer QPO, and this superposition phenomenon can explain the linear upward trend. The viewing angle of the blob undergoes periodic changes, while jet precession results in a longer QPO. When the longer QPO fluxes are increasing state, a periodic rising tendency may be observed.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.