Paper detail

Studies of the distinct regions due to CO selective dissociation in the Aquila molecular cloud

Aims. We investigate the role of selective dissociation in the process of star formation by comparing the physical parameters of protostellar-prestellar cores and the distinct regions with the CO isotope distributions in photodissociation regions. We seek to understand whether there is a better connection between the evolutionary age of star forming regions and the effect of selective dissociation Methods. Wide-field observations of the $\rm ^{12}CO$, $\rm ^{13}CO$, and $\rm C^{18}O$ ( J = 1 - 0) emission lines are used to study the ongoing star formation activity in the Aquila molecular region, and the 70 $μ$m and 250 $μ$m data are used to describe the heating of the surrounding material and as an indicator of the evolutionary age of the core. Results. The protostellar-prestellar cores are found at locations with the highest $\rm C^{18}O$ column densities and their increasing evolutionary age would relate to an increasing 70$μ$m/250$μ$m emission ratio at their location. An evolutionary age of the cores may also follow from the $\rm ^{13}CO$ versus $\rm C^{18}O$ abundance ratio, which decreases with increasing $\rm C^{18}O$ column densities. The original mass has been estimated for nine representative star formation regions and the original mass of the region correlated well with the integrated 70 $μ$m flux density. Similarly, the $ X_{\rm ^{13}CO}$/$X_{\rm C^{18}O}$ implying the dissociation rate for these regions correlates with the 70$μ$m/250$μ$m flux density ratio and reflects the evolutionary age of the star formation activity.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.