Paper detail

Structures of solid hydrogen at 300K

We present results predicting experimentally measurable structural quantities from molecular dynamics studies of hydrogen. In doing this, we propose a paradigm shift for experimentalists -- that the predictions from such calculations should be seen as the most likely hypotheses. Specifically, the experimental results should be aiming to distinguish between the candidate low-energy structures, rather than aiming to solve the simplest structure consistent with the data. We show that the room temperature X-ray diffraction patterns for hydrogen phases I, III, IV and V are very similar, with only small peaks denoting symmetry-breaking from the hcp Phase I. Because they incorporate atomic displacements the XRD patterns implied by molecular dynamics calculations are very different from those arising from the static minimum enthalpy structures found by structure searching. Simulations also show that within Phase I the molecular becomes increasingly confined to the basal plane and suggest the possibility of an unusual critical point terminating the Phase I-III boundary line.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.