Paper detail

Structured Red Giant Winds with Magnetized Hot Bubbles and the Corona/Cool Wind Dividing Line

By performing MHD simulations, we investigate the mass loss of intermediate- and low-mass stars from main sequence (MS) to red giant branch (RGB) phases. Alfven waves, which are excited by the surface convections travel outwardly and dissipate by nonlinear processes to accelerate and heat the stellar winds. We dynamically treat these processes in open magnetic field regions from the photospheres to 25 stellar radii. When the stars evolve to slightly blueward positions of the dividing line (Linsky & Haisch), the steady hot corona with temperature, ~ 1MK, suddenly disappears. Instead, many hot (~1MK) and warm (~10^5K) bubbles are formed in cool (T<~2x10^4K) chromospheric winds because of thermal instability; the red giant wind is not a steady stream but structured outflow. As a result, the mass loss rates, \dot{M}, largely vary in time by 3-4 orders or magnitude in the RGB stars. Supported by magnetic pressure, the density of hot bubbles can be kept low to reduce the radiative cooling and to maintain the high temperature long time. Even in the stars redward of the dividing line, hot bubbles intermittently exist, and they can be sources of UV/soft X-ray emissions from hybrid stars. Nearly static regions are formed above the photospheres of the RGB stars, and the stellar winds are effectively accelerated from several stellar radii. Then, the wind velocity is much smaller than the surface escape speed, because it is regulated by the slower escape speed at that location. We finally derive an equation that determines \dot{M} from the energetics of the simulated wave-driven winds in a forward manner. The relation explains \dot{M} from MS to RGB, and it can play a complementary role to the Reimers&#39; formula, which is mainly for more luminous stars.

preprint2007arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.