Paper detail

Structure Theorems for Basic Algebras

A basic finite dimensional algebra over an algebraically closed field $k$ is isomorphic to a quotient of a tensor algebra by an admissible ideal. The category of left modules over the algebra is isomorphic to the category of representations of a finite quiver with relations. In this article we will remove the assumption that $k$ is algebraically closed to look at both perfect and non-perfect fields. We will introduce the notion of species with relations to describe the category of left modules over such algebras. If the field is not perfect, then the algebra is isomorphic to a quotient of a tensor algebra by an ideal that is no longer admissible in general. This gives hereditary algebras isomorphic to a quotient of a tensor algebra by a non-zero ideal. We will show that these non-zero ideals correspond to cyclic subgraphs of the graph associated to the species of the algebra. This will lead to the ideal being zero in the case when the underlying graph of the algebra is a tree.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.