Paper detail

Structure theorem for U5-free tournaments

Let $U_5$ be the tournament with vertices $v_1$, ..., $v_5$ such that $v_2 \rightarrow v_1$, and $v_i \rightarrow v_j$ if $j-i \equiv 1$, $2 \pmod{5}$ and ${i,j} \neq {1,2}$. In this paper we describe the tournaments which do not have $U_5$ as a subtournament. Specifically, we show that if a tournament $G$ is "prime"---that is, if there is no subset $X \subseteq V(G)$, $1 < |X| < |V(G)|$, such that for all $v \in V(G) \backslash X$, either $v \rightarrow x$ for all $x \in X$ or $x \rightarrow v$ for all $x \in X$---then $G$ is $U_5$-free if and only if either $G$ is a specific tournament $T_n$ or $V(G)$ can be partitioned into sets $X$, $Y$, $Z$ such that $X \cup Y$, $Y \cup Z$, and $Z \cup X$ are transitive. From the prime $U_5$-free tournaments we can construct all the $U_5$-free tournaments. We use the theorem to show that every $U_5$-free tournament with $n$ vertices has a transitive subtournament with at least $n^{\log_3 2}$ vertices, and that this bound is tight.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.