Paper detail

Structure of random r-SAT below the pure literal threshold

It is well known that there is a sharp density threshold for a random $r$-SAT formula to be satisfiable, and a similar, smaller, threshold for it to be satisfied by the pure literal rule. Also, above the satisfiability threshold, where a random formula is with high probability (whp) unsatisfiable, the unsatisfiability is whp due to a large "minimal unsatisfiable subformula" (MUF). By contrast, we show that for the (rare) unsatisfiable formulae below the pure literal threshold, the unsatisfiability is whp due to a unique MUF with smallest possible "excess", failing this whp due to a unique MUF with the next larger excess, and so forth. In the same regime, we give a precise asymptotic expansion for the probability that a formula is unsatisfiable, and efficient algorithms for satisfying a formula or proving its unsatisfiability. It remains open what happens between the pure literal threshold and the satisfiability threshold. We prove analogous results for the $k$-core and $k$-colorability thresholds for a random graph, or more generally a random $r$-uniform hypergraph.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.