Paper detail

Structure dynamics of evolving scientific networks

Co-authorship networks have been extensively studied in network science as they pose as a perfect example of how single elements of a system give rise to collective phenomena on an intricate, non-trivial structure of interactions. However, co-authorship networks are, in fact, one-mode projections of original bipartite networks, which we call here scientific networks, where authors are agents connected to artifacts - the papers they have published. Nonetheless, few studies take into account the structure of the original bipartite network to understand and explain the topological properties of the projected network. Here, we create bipartite networks using extensive datasets from the American Physical Society (APS) dating back to 1893 up to 2015 inclusive, and from arXiv (1986-2015). We look at the time evolution of publications and at the dynamic structure of scientific networks considering four major features of bipartite networks, namely degree distributions, density, redundancy and cycles. We show how such features shape the formation of co-authorship networks and their observed structural properties. While the structure of the networks of most disciplines does not show significant changes over time, the appearance of large collaborations, in physics, generate largely skewed degree distributions of top nodes. The latter, in turn, induces massive cliques in the projection, triggering considerable densification of the co-authorship network, while the density of the original bipartite network remains at the same levels.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.