Paper detail

Structure and fluctuations of a slow ICME sheath observed at 0.5 au by the Parker Solar Probe

Sheaths ahead of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) are turbulent heliospheric structures. Knowledge of their structure and fluctuations is important for understanding their geoeffectiveness, their role in accelerating particles, and the interaction of ICMEs with the solar wind. We studied observations from the Parker Solar Probe of a sheath observed at 0.5 au in March 2019, ahead of a slow streamer blowout CME. To examine the MHD-scale turbulent properties, we calculated fluctuation amplitudes, magnetic compressibility, partial variance of increments (PVI), cross helicity ($σ_c$), residual energy ($σ_r$), and the Jensen-Shannon permutation entropy and complexity. The sheath consisted of slow and fast flows separated by a 15-min change in magnetic sector that coincided with current sheet crossings and a velocity shear zone. Fluctuation amplitudes and PVI were greater through the sheath than upstream. Fluctuations had mostly negative $σ_r$ and positive $σ_c$ in the sheath, the latter indicating an anti-sunward sense of propagation. The velocity shear region marked an increase in temperature and specific entropy, and the faster flow behind had local patches of positive $σ_r$ as well as higher fluctuation amplitudes and PVI. Fluctuations in the preceding wind and sheath were stochastic, with the sheath fluctuations showing lower entropy and higher complexity than upstream. The two-part sheath structure likely resulted from a warp in the heliospheric current sheet (HCS) being swept up and compressed. The ejecta accelerated and heated the wind at the sheath rear, which then interacted with the slower wind ahead of the HCS warp. This caused differences in fluctuation properties across the sheath. Sheaths of slow ICMEs can thus have complex structure where fluctuation properties are not just downstream shock properties, but are generated within the sheath.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.