Paper detail

Structure and evolution of super-Earth to super-Jupiter exoplanets: I. heavy element enrichment in the interior

We examine the uncertainties in current planetary models and we quantify their impact on the planet cooling histories and mass-radius relationships. These uncertainties include (i) the differences between the various equations of state used to characterize the heavy material thermodynamical properties, (ii) the distribution of heavy elements within planetary interiors, (iii) their chemical composition and (iv) their thermal contribution to the planet evolution. Our models, which include a gaseous H/He envelope, are compared with models of solid, gasless Earth-like planets in order to examine the impact of a gaseous envelope on the cooling and the resulting radius. We find that for a fraction of heavy material larger than 20% of the planet mass, the distribution of the heavy elements in the planet's interior affects substantially the evolution and thus the radius at a given age. For planets with large core mass fractions ($\simgr$ 50%), such as the Neptune-mass transiting planet GJ436b, the contribution of the gravitational and thermal energy from the core to the planet cooling history is not negligible, yielding a $\sim$ 10% effect on the radius after 1 Gyr. We show that the present mass and radius determinations of the massive planet Hat-P-2b require at least 200 $\mearth$ of heavy material in the interior, at the edge of what is currently predicted by the core-accretion model for planet formation. We show that if planets as massive as $\sim$ 25 $\mjup$ can form, as predicted by improved core-accretion models, deuterium is able to burn in the H/He layers above the core, even for core masses as large as $\sim$ 100 $\mearth$. We provide extensive grids of planetary evolution models from 10 $\mearth$ to 10 M$_{\rm Jup}$, with various fractions of heavy elements.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.