Paper detail

Structure Analysis on the $k$-error Linear Complexity for $2^n$-periodic Binary Sequences

In this paper, in order to characterize the critical error linear complexity spectrum (CELCS) for $2^n$-periodic binary sequences, we first propose a decomposition based on the cube theory. Based on the proposed $k$-error cube decomposition, and the famous inclusion-exclusion principle, we obtain the complete characterization of $i$th descent point (critical point) of the k-error linear complexity for $i=2,3$. Second, by using the sieve method and Games-Chan algorithm, we characterize the second descent point (critical point) distribution of the $k$-error linear complexity for $2^n$-periodic binary sequences. As a consequence, we obtain the complete counting functions on the $k$-error linear complexity of $2^n$-periodic binary sequences as the second descent point for $k=3,4$. This is the first time for the second and the third descent points to be completely characterized. In fact, the proposed constructive approach has the potential to be used for constructing $2^n$-periodic binary sequences with the given linear complexity and $k$-error linear complexity (or CELCS), which is a challenging problem to be deserved for further investigation in future.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.