Paper detail

Structural properties of Stochastic Abelian Sandpile

We present some combinatorial results on the stochastic abelian sandpile model. These models are characterized by nondeterministic toppling rules. The recurrence checking for the deterministic case can be performed using the well known burning test which detects presence of forbidden sub-configurations (FSC) in strongly polynomial time. In the stochastic case, however, even for Manna's model, which is perhaps the simplest non-trivial example, no such procedure is known. In this paper, we address the decision problem of the existence of any FSC in a general stochastic sandpile. We demonstrate a polynomial time algorithm which, given the sandpile graph and toppling rules, decides if there exists an FSC. In the event of a positive answer, it generates at least one FSC for the given sandpile. Repeated application of the algorithm can be used to find many distinct FSCs. We also demonstrate a procedure for creating larger FSCs from smaller ones and use this to create FSCs for the Manna's model. We hope that the structural analysis of stochastic sandpile we perform in this paper, will prove useful in the eventual formulation of a deterministic procedure to decide recurrence.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.