Paper detail

Structural properties and average tapping time on scale-free graphs with smallest diameter

In this paper, we propose a class of graphs $G^{\star}(m,t)$ and first study some structural properties, such as, average degree, on them. The results show that (1) graphs $G^{\star}(m,t)$ have density feature because of their average degrees proportional to time step $t$ not to a constant in the large graph size limit, (2) graphs $G^{\star}(m,t)$ obey the power-law distribution with exponent equal to $2$, which is rarely found in most previous scale-free models, (3) graphs $G^{\star}(m,t)$ display small-world property in terms of ultra-small diameter and higher clustering coefficient, and (4) graphs $G^{\star}(m,t)$ possess disassortative structure with respect to Pearson correlation coefficient smaller than zero. In addition, we consider the trapping problem on the proposed graphs $G^{\star}(m,t)$ and then find that they all have more optimal trapping efficiency by means of their own average trapping time achieving the theoretical lower bound, a phenomenon that is seldom observed in existing scale-free models. We conduct extensive simulations that are consistent with our theoretical analysis.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.