Paper detail

Structural Identifiability of Series-Parallel LCR Systems

We consider the identifiability problem for the parameters of series-parallel LCR circuit networks. We prove that for networks with only two classes of components (inductor-capacitor (LC), inductor-resistor (LR), and capacitor-resistor (RC)), the parameters are identifiable if and only if the number of non-monic coefficients of the constitutive equations equals the number of parameters. The notion of the "type" of the constitutive equations plays a key role in the identifiability of LC, LR, and RC networks. We also investigate the general series-parallel LCR circuits (with all three classes of components), and classify the types of constitutive equations that can arise, showing that there are 22 different types. However, we produce an example that shows that the basic notion of type that works to classify identifiability of two class networks is not sufficient to classify the identifiability of general series-parallel LCR circuits.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.