Abstract

This paper studies pseudo-bulges (P-bulges) and classical bulges (C-bulges) in Sloan Digital Sky Survey central galaxies using the new bulge indicator ΔΣ1ΔΣ_1, which measures relative central stellar-mass surface density within 1 kpc. We compare ΔΣ1ΔΣ_1 to the established bulge-type indicator Δ⟨μe⟩Δ\langleμ_e\rangle from Gadotti (2009) and show that classifying by ΔΣ1ΔΣ_1 agrees well with Δ⟨μe⟩Δ\langleμ_e\rangle. ΔΣ1ΔΣ_1 requires no bulge-disk decomposition and can be measured on SDSS images out to z=0.07z = 0.07. Bulge types using it are mapped onto twenty different structural and stellar-population properties for 12,000 SDSS central galaxies with masses 10.0 < log M∗M_*/M⊙M_{\odot} < 10.4. New trends emerge from this large sample. Structural parameters show fairly linear log-log relations vs. ΔΣ1ΔΣ_1 and Δ⟨μe⟩Δ\langleμ_e\rangle with only moderate scatter, while stellar-population parameters show a highly non-linear "elbow" in which specific star-formation rate remains roughly flat with increasing central density and then falls rapidly at the elbow, where galaxies begin to quench. P-bulges occupy the low-density end of the horizontal arm of the elbow and are universally star-forming, while C-bulges occupy the elbow and the vertical branch and exhibit a wide range of star-formation rates at fixed density. The non-linear relation between central density and star-formation rate has been seen before, but this mapping onto bulge class is new. The wide range of star-formation rates in C-bulges helps to explain why bulge classifications using different parameters have sometimes disagreed in the past. The elbow-shaped relation between density and stellar indices suggests that central structure and stellar-populations evolve at different rates as galaxies begin to quench.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.