Paper detail

Strong subalgebras and the Constraint Satisfaction Problem

In 2007 it was conjectured that the Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) over a constraint language $Γ$ is tractable if and only if $Γ$ is preserved by a weak near-unanimity (WNU) operation. After many efforts and partial results, this conjecture was independently proved by Andrei Bulatov and the author in 2017. In this paper we consider one of two main ingredients of my proof, that is, strong subalgebras that allow us to reduce domains of the variables iteratively. To explain how this idea works we show the algebraic properties of strong subalgebras and provide self-contained proof of two important facts about the complexity of the CSP. First, we prove that if a constraint language is not preserved by a WNU operation then the corresponding CSP is NP-hard. Second, we characterize all constraint languages that can be solved by local consistency checking. Additionally, we characterize all idempotent algebras not having a WNU term of a concrete arity $n$, not having a WNU term, having WNU terms of all arities greater than 2. Most of the results presented in the paper are not new, but I believe this paper can help to understand my approach to CSP and the new self-contained proof of known facts will be also useful.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.