Paper detail

Strong stationary times and its use in cryptography

This paper presents applicability of Strong Stationary Times (SST) techniques in the area of cryptography. The applicability is in three areas: *) Propositions of a new class of cryptographic algorithms (pseudo-random permutation generators) which do not run for the predefined number of steps. Instead, these algorithms stop according to a stopping rule defined as SST, for which one can obtain provable properties: *** results are perfect samples from uniform distribution, *** immunity to timing attacks (no information about the resulting permutation leaks through the information about the number of steps SST algorithm *) We show how one can leverage properties of SST-based algorithms to construct an implementation (of a symmetric encryption scheme) which is immune to the timing-attack by reusing implementations which are not secure against timing-attacks. In symmetric key cryptography researchers mainly focus on constant time (re)implementations. Our approach goes in a different direction and explores ideas of input masking. *) Analysis of idealized (mathematical) models of existing cryptographic schemes -- i.e., we improve a result by Mironov ((Not So) Random Shuffles of RC4; Advances in Cryptology -- CRYPTO 2002)

preprint2017arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.