Paper detail

Strong spatial mixing in homomorphism spaces

Given a countable graph $\mathcal{G}$ and a finite graph $\mathrm{H}$, we consider $\mathrm{Hom}(\mathcal{G},\mathrm{H})$ the set of graph homomorphisms from $\mathcal{G}$ to $\mathrm{H}$ and we study Gibbs measures supported on $\mathrm{Hom}(\mathcal{G},\mathrm{H})$ . We develop some sufficient and other necessary conditions on $\mathrm{Hom}(\mathcal{G},\mathrm{H})$ for the existence of Gibbs specifications satisfying strong spatial mixing (with exponential decay rate). We relate this with previous work of Brightwell and Winkler, who showed that a graph $\mathrm{H}$ has a combinatorial property called dismantlability if and only if for every $\mathcal{G}$ of bounded degree, there exists a Gibbs specification with unique Gibbs measure. We strengthen their result by showing that this unique Gibbs measure can be chosen to have weak spatial mixing, but we also show that there exist dismantlable graphs for which no Gibbs measure has strong spatial mixing.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.