Paper detail

Strong RR Lyrae excess in the Hercules-Aquila Cloud

We map the large-scale sub-structure in the Galactic stellar halo using accurate 3D positions of ~14,000 RR Lyrae reported by the Catalina Sky Survey. In the heliocentric distance range of 10-25 kpc, in the region of the sky approximately bounded by 30° < l < 55° and -45° < b < -25°, there appears to be a strong excess of RRab stars. This overdensity, peaking at 18 kpc, is most likely associated with the so-called Hercules-Aquila Cloud, previously detected using Main Sequence tracers at similar distances in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey data. Our analysis of the period-amplitude distribution of RR Lyrae in this region indicates that the HAC is dominated by the Oosterhoff I type population. By comparing the measured RR Lyrae number density to models of a smooth stellar halo, we estimate the significance of the observed excess and provide an updated estimate of the total luminosity of the Cloud&#39;s progenitor.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.