Paper detail

Strong observational constraints on Advection-Dominated Accretion in the cores of elliptical galaxies

The growing evidence for supermassive black holes in the centres of nearby galaxies has brought into sharper focus the question of why elliptical galaxies, rich in hot gas, do not possess quasar-like luminosities. Recent studies suggest that advection-dominated accretion flows (ADAFs), with associated low radiative efficiency, might provide an explanation for the observed quiescence. Although ADAF models have been applied to a number of low-luminosity systems, compelling observational evidence for their existence is still required. Here, we examine new high-frequency radio observations of the giant, low-luminosity elliptical galaxies NGC 4649, NGC 4472 and NGC 4636 made with the Very Large Array (VLA) and the sub-millimetre common-user bolometer array (SCUBA) on the JCMT. At these frequencies the predictions are very precise and an ADAF is unequivocally characterised by a slowly rising spectrum with a sharp spectral cut-off produced by thermal synchrotron radiation. The new radio limits severely disagree with the canonical ADAF predictions which significantly overestimate the observed flux. While our observations do not rule out the presence of an ADAF in these objects, they place strong constraints on the model. If the accretion in these objects occurs in an advection-dominated mode then our radio limits imply that the emission from their central regions must be suppressed. We examine the possibility that the magnetic field in the flow is extremely low or that synchrotron emission is free-free absorbed by cold material in the accretion flow. We also discuss whether slow non-radiating accretion flows may drive winds/outflows to remove energy, angular momentum and mass so that the central densities, pressures and emissivities are much smaller than in a standard ADAF.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.