Paper detail

Strong mixing properties of max-infinitely divisible random fields

Let $η=(η(t))_{t\in T}$ be a sample continuous max-infinitely random field on a locally compact metric space $T$. For a closed subset $S\in T$, we note $η_{S}$ the restriction of $η$ to $S$. We consider $β(S_1,S_2)$ the absolute regularity coefficient between $η_{S_1}$ and $η_{S_2}$, where $S_1,S_2$ are two disjoint closed subsets of $T$. Our main result is a simple upper bound for $β(S_1,S_2)$ involving the exponent measure $μ$ of $η$: we prove that $β(S_1,S_2)\leq 2\int \bbP[η\not<_{S_1} f,\ η\not <_{S_2} f]\,μ(df)$, where $f\not<_{S} g$ means that there exists $s\in S$ such that $f(s)\geq g(s)$. If $η$ is a simple max-stable random field, the upper bound is related to the so-called extremal coefficients: for countable disjoint sets $S_1$ and $S_2$, we obtain $β(S_1,S_2)\leq 4\sum_{(s_1,s_2)\in S_1\times S_2}(2-θ(s_1,s_2))$, where $θ(s_1,s_2)$ is the pair extremal coefficient. As an application, we show that these new estimates entail a central limit theorem for stationary max-infinitely divisible random fields on $\bbZ^d$. In the stationary max-stable case, we derive the asymptotic normality of three simple estimators of the pair extremal coefficient.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.