Paper detail

Strong microwave absorption observed in dielectric La1.5Sr0.5NiO4 nanoparticles

La$_{1.5}$Sr$_{0.5}$NiO$_4$ is well known to have a colossal dielectric constant ($\varepsilon_R>10^7$). The La$_{1.5}$Sr$_{0.5}$NiO$_4$ nanoparticle powder was prepared by a combinational method of solid state reaction and high-energy ball milling. Magnetic measurements show that the material has a very small magnetic moment and paramagnetic characteristic at room temperature. The mixture of the nanoparticle powder (40% vol.) and paraffin (60% vol.) coated in the form of flat layers of different thicknesses ($t$) exhibits strong microwave absorption resonances in the 4-18 GHz range. The reflection loss ($RL$) decreases with $t$ and reaches down to -36.7 dB for $t=3.0$ mm. The impedance matching ($|Z|=Z_0=377$ $Ω$), rather than the phase matching mechanism, is found responsible for the resonance observed in the samples with $1<t\leq3.0$ mm. Further increase of the thickness leads to $|Z|>Z_0$ at all frequencies and a reduced absorption. The influence of non-metal backing is also discussed. Our observation suggests that La$_{1.5}$Sr$_{0.5}$NiO$_4$ nanoparticles could be used as good fillers for high performance radar absorbing material.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.