Paper detail

Strong Matching of Points with Geometric Shapes

Let $P$ be a set of $n$ points in general position in the plane. Given a convex geometric shape $S$, a geometric graph $G_S(P)$ on $P$ is defined to have an edge between two points if and only if there exists an empty homothet of $S$ having the two points on its boundary. A matching in $G_S(P)$ is said to be $strong$, if the homothests of $S$ representing the edges of the matching, are pairwise disjoint, i.e., do not share any point in the plane. We consider the problem of computing a strong matching in $G_S(P)$, where $S$ is a diametral-disk, an equilateral-triangle, or a square. We present an algorithm which computes a strong matching in $G_S(P)$; if $S$ is a diametral-disk, then it computes a strong matching of size at least $\lceil \frac{n-1}{17} \rceil$, and if $S$ is an equilateral-triangle, then it computes a strong matching of size at least $\lceil \frac{n-1}{9} \rceil$. If $S$ can be a downward or an upward equilateral-triangle, we compute a strong matching of size at least $\lceil \frac{n-1}{4} \rceil$ in $G_S(P)$. When $S$ is an axis-aligned square we compute a strong matching of size $\lceil \frac{n-1}{4} \rceil$ in $G_S(P)$, which improves the previous lower bound of $\lceil \frac{n}{5} \rceil$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.