Paper detail

Strong limits on the possible decay of the vacuum energy into CDM or CMB photons

We investigate models that suggest that the vacuum energy decays into cold dark matter (CDM) and into a homogeneous distribution of a thermalized cosmic microwave background (CMB), which is characteristic of an adiabatic vacuum energy decay into photons. We show that the density fluctuation spectrum obtained from the CMB and galaxy distribution data agreement put strong limits on the rate of decay of the vacuum energy. A vacuum energy decaying into CDM increases its total density ρ, diluting (δρ/ρ)^2. The observed temperature fluctuations of the CMB photons (δT/T)^2 are approximately proportional to CDM density fluctuations (δρ/ρ)^2. In both case, when evaluating (δρ/ρ)^2 at the recombination era, its present measured value must be increased by a factor F. Since the (δρ/ρ)^2 derived from the CMB and galaxy distribution data agree to \sim 10%, the maximum value for F is F_{\rm max}\aprox 1.1. Our results indicate that the rate of the decay of the vacuum energy into CDM and CMB photons are extremely small.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.