Paper detail

Strong-field effects in the photo-emission spectrum of the C$_{60}$ fullerene

Considering C$_{60}$ as a model system for describing field emission from the extremity of a carbon nanotip, we explore electron emission from this fullerene excited by an intense, near-infrared, few-cycle laser pulse ($10^{13}$-$10^{14}~{\rm W/cm}^2$, 912 nm, 8-cycle). To this end, we use time-dependent density functional theory augmented by a self-interaction correction. The ionic background of C$_{60}$ is described by a soft jellium model. Particular attention is paid to the high energy electrons. Comparing the spectra at different emission angles, we find that, as a major result of this study, the photoelectrons are strongly peaked along the laser polarization axis forming a highly collimated electron beam in the forward direction, especially for the high energy electrons. Moreover, the high-energy plateau cut-off found in the simulations agrees well with estimates from the classical three-step model. We also investigate the build-up of the high-energy part of a photoelectron spectrum by a time-resolved analysis. In particular, the modulation on the plateau can be interpreted as contributions from intracycle and intercycle interferences.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.