Paper detail

Strong enhancement of bulk superconductivity by engineered nanogranularity

It is now well established, both theoretically and experimentally, that very small changes in the size of isolated nanograins lead to substantial nonmonotonic variations, and sometimes enhancement, of the mean-field spectroscopic gap of conventional superconductors. A natural question to ask, of broad relevance for the theory and applications of superconductivity, is whether these size effects can also enhance the critical temperature of a bulk granular material composed of such nanograins. Here we answer this question affirmatively. We combine mean-field, semiclassical, and percolation techniques to show that engineered nanoscale granularity in conventional superconductors can enhance the critical temperature by up to a few times compared to the nongranular bulk limit. This prediction is valid for three-dimensional and also quasi-two-dimensional samples, provided the thickness is much larger than the grain size. Our model takes into account an experimentally realistic distribution of grain sizes in the array, charging effects, tunnelling by quasiparticles, and limitations related to the proliferation of thermal fluctuations for sufficiently small grains.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.