Strong downward Löwenheim-Skolem theorems for stationary logics, II -- reflection down to the continuum

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Abstract

Continuing the previous paper, we study the Strong Downward Löwenheim-Skolem Theorems (SDLSs) of the stationary logic and their variations. It has been shown that the SDLS for the ordinary stationary logic with weak second-order parameters down to <ℵ2<\aleph_2 is equivalent to the conjunction of CH and Cox's Diagonal Reflection Principle for internally clubness. We show that the SDLS for the stationary logic without weak second-order parameters down to <2ℵ0<2^{\aleph_0} implies that the size of the continuum is ℵ2\aleph_2. In contrast, an internal interpretation of the stationary logic can satisfy the SDLS down to <2ℵ0<2^{\aleph_0} under the continuum being of size >ℵ2>\aleph_2. This SDLS is shown to be equivalent to an internal version of the Diagonal Reflection Principle down to an internally stationary set of size <2ℵ0<2^{\aleph_0}. We also consider a Pκλ{\cal P}_κλ version of the stationary logic and show that the SDLS for this logic in internal interpretation for reflection down to <2ℵ0<2^{\aleph_0} is consistent under the assumption of the consistency of ZFC ++ "the existence of a supercompact cardinal" and this SDLS implies that the continuum is (at least) weakly Mahlo. These three "axioms" in terms of SDLS are consequences of three instances of a strengthening of generic supercompactness which we call Laver-generic supercompactness. Existence of a Laver-generic supercompact cardinal in each of these three instances also fixes the cardinality of the continuum to be ℵ1\aleph_1 or ℵ2\aleph_2 or very large respectively. We also show that the existence of one of these generic large cardinals implies the "++++" version of the corresponding forcing axiom.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.