Paper detail

Strong CP violation: problem or blessing?

We readdress the issue of strong CP violation both in the Standard Model and in the Minimal Left-Right Symmetric Model and try to clear the confusion that seems to still pervade the field. We argue that the smallness of strong CP violation, while harmless and basically decoupled from the rest of physics in the SM, in the context of LR symmetry provides a blessing by helping to narrow down the parameter space of the theory and connecting apparently uncorrelated physical quantities. In particular, in the context of left-right symmetry being parity, it either points to the suppression of leptonic CP violation noticed before, or it leads to relatively light right-handed neutrinos, potentially accessible at the next hadron collider. The latter, more natural in view of complex quark Yukawa couplings, goes hand in hand with the smallness of lepton flavor violation and enhances the possibility of observing neutrinoless double beta decay.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.