Paper detail

Strong CP and SUZ$_2$

Solutions to the strong CP problem typically introduce new scales associated with the spontaneous breaking of symmetries. Absent any anthropic argument for small $\barθ$, these scales require stabilization against ultraviolet corrections. Supersymmetry offers a tempting stabilization mechanism, since it can solve the "big" electroweak hierarchy problem at the same time. One family of solutions to strong CP, including generalized parity models, heavy axion models, and heavy $η^\prime$ models, introduces $\mathbb{Z}_2$ copies of (part of) the Standard Model and an associated scale of $\mathbb{Z}_2$-breaking. We review why, without additional structure such as supersymmetry, the $\mathbb{Z}_2$-breaking scale is unacceptably tuned. We then study "SUZ$_2$" models, supersymmetric theories with $\mathbb{Z}_2$ copies of the MSSM. We find that the addition of SUSY typically destroys the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ protection of $\barθ=0$, even at tree level, once SUSY and $\mathbb{Z}_2$ are broken. In theories like supersymmetric completions of the twin Higgs, where $\mathbb{Z}_2$ addresses the little hierarchy problem but not strong CP, two axions can be used to relax $\barθ$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.