Paper detail

String tension from gauge invariant Magnetic Monopoles

We investigate the relationship between colour confinement and the monopoles derived from the Cho-Duan-Ge decomposition. These monopoles, unlike Dirac and 't Hooft monopoles, do not require a singular gauge field and are defined for any choice of gauge (and are not just restricted to, for example, the maximum Abelian gauge). The Abelian decomposition is defined in terms of a colour field $n$; the principle novelty of our study is that we have used a unique definition of this field in terms of the eigenvectors of the Wilson Loop. This allows us to investigate the relationship between the gauge invariant monopoles and confinement both analytically and numerically, as well as retaining the maximal possible symmetry within the colour field so that it is able to see all the monopoles in an SU($N_C$) calculation. We describe how the Abelian decomposition is related to the Wilson Loop, so that the string tension may be calculated from the field strength related to the decomposed (or restricted) Abelian field. We discuss the structures in the colour field which may cause an area law in the Wilson Loop, which turn out to be magnetic monopoles. If these monopoles are present, they will lead to an area law scaling of the Wilson Loop and thus be at least partially responsible for confinement. We search for these monopoles in quenched lattice QCD. We show that the string tension is dominated by peaks in the restricted field strength, at least some of which are located close to structures in the colour field consistent with with theoretical expectations for the monopoles. We show that the string tension extracted from the monopole contribution to the restricted field is close to that of the entire original field; again suggesting that confinement can at least partially be explained in terms of these monopoles.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.